SECCOMP
Section: Linux Programmer's Manual (2)
Updated: 2021-03-22
Index
Return to Main Contents
NAME
seccomp - operate on Secure Computing state of the process
SYNOPSIS
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
int seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args);
Note:
There is no glibc wrapper for this system call; see NOTES.
DESCRIPTION
The
seccomp()
system call operates on the Secure Computing (seccomp) state of the
calling process.
Currently, Linux supports the following
operation
values:
- SECCOMP_SET_MODE_STRICT
-
The only system calls that the calling thread is permitted to make are
read(2),
write(2),
_exit(2)
(but not
exit_group(2)),
and
sigreturn(2).
Other system calls result in the delivery of a
SIGKILL
signal.
Strict secure computing mode is useful for number-crunching
applications that may need to execute untrusted byte code, perhaps
obtained by reading from a pipe or socket.
-
Note that although the calling thread can no longer call
sigprocmask(2),
it can use
sigreturn(2)
to block all signals apart from
SIGKILL
and
SIGSTOP.
This means that
alarm(2)
(for example) is not sufficient for restricting the process's execution time.
Instead, to reliably terminate the process,
SIGKILL
must be used.
This can be done by using
timer_create(2)
with
SIGEV_SIGNAL
and
sigev_signo
set to
SIGKILL,
or by using
setrlimit(2)
to set the hard limit for
RLIMIT_CPU.
-
This operation is available only if the kernel is configured with
CONFIG_SECCOMP
enabled.
-
The value of
flags
must be 0, and
args
must be NULL.
-
This operation is functionally identical to the call:
-
prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT);
- SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER
-
The system calls allowed are defined by a pointer to a Berkeley Packet
Filter (BPF) passed via
args.
This argument is a pointer to a
struct sock_fprog;
it can be designed to filter arbitrary system calls and system call
arguments.
If the filter is invalid,
seccomp()
fails, returning
EINVAL
in
errno.
-
If
fork(2)
or
clone(2)
is allowed by the filter, any child processes will be constrained to
the same system call filters as the parent.
If
execve(2)
is allowed,
the existing filters will be preserved across a call to
execve(2).
-
In order to use the
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER
operation, either the calling thread must have the
CAP_SYS_ADMIN
capability in its user namespace, or the thread must already have the
no_new_privs
bit set.
If that bit was not already set by an ancestor of this thread,
the thread must make the following call:
-
prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1);
-
Otherwise, the
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER
operation fails and returns
EACCES
in
errno.
This requirement ensures that an unprivileged process cannot apply
a malicious filter and then invoke a set-user-ID or
other privileged program using
execve(2),
thus potentially compromising that program.
(Such a malicious filter might, for example, cause an attempt to use
setuid(2)
to set the caller's user IDs to nonzero values to instead
return 0 without actually making the system call.
Thus, the program might be tricked into retaining superuser privileges
in circumstances where it is possible to influence it to do
dangerous things because it did not actually drop privileges.)
-
If
prctl(2)
or
seccomp()
is allowed by the attached filter, further filters may be added.
This will increase evaluation time, but allows for further reduction of
the attack surface during execution of a thread.
-
The
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER
operation is available only if the kernel is configured with
CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
enabled.
-
When
flags
is 0, this operation is functionally identical to the call:
-
prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, args);
-
The recognized
flags
are:
-
- SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC
-
When adding a new filter, synchronize all other threads of the calling
process to the same seccomp filter tree.
A "filter tree" is the ordered list of filters attached to a thread.
(Attaching identical filters in separate
seccomp()
calls results in different filters from this perspective.)
-
If any thread cannot synchronize to the same filter tree,
the call will not attach the new seccomp filter,
and will fail, returning the first thread ID found that cannot synchronize.
Synchronization will fail if another thread in the same process is in
SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT
or if it has attached new seccomp filters to itself,
diverging from the calling thread's filter tree.
- SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG (since Linux 4.14)
-
All filter return actions except
SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW
should be logged.
An administrator may override this filter flag by preventing specific
actions from being logged via the
/proc/sys/kernel/seccomp/actions_logged
file.
- SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW (since Linux 4.17)
-
Disable Speculative Store Bypass mitigation.
- SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL (since Linux 4.14)
-
Test to see if an action is supported by the kernel.
This operation is helpful to confirm that the kernel knows
of a more recently added filter return action
since the kernel treats all unknown actions as
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS.
-
The value of
flags
must be 0, and
args
must be a pointer to an unsigned 32-bit filter return action.
Filters
When adding filters via
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER,
args
points to a filter program:
struct sock_fprog {
unsigned short len; /* Number of BPF instructions */
struct sock_filter *filter; /* Pointer to array of
BPF instructions */
};
Each program must contain one or more BPF instructions:
struct sock_filter { /* Filter block */
__u16 code; /* Actual filter code */
__u8 jt; /* Jump true */
__u8 jf; /* Jump false */
__u32 k; /* Generic multiuse field */
};
When executing the instructions, the BPF program operates on the
system call information made available (i.e., use the
BPF_ABS
addressing mode) as a (read-only)
buffer of the following form:
struct seccomp_data {
int nr; /* System call number */
__u32 arch; /* AUDIT_ARCH_* value
(see <linux/audit.h>) */
__u64 instruction_pointer; /* CPU instruction pointer */
__u64 args[6]; /* Up to 6 system call arguments */
};
Because numbering of system calls varies between architectures and
some architectures (e.g., x86-64) allow user-space code to use
the calling conventions of multiple architectures
(and the convention being used may vary over the life of a process that uses
execve(2)
to execute binaries that employ the different conventions),
it is usually necessary to verify the value of the
arch
field.
It is strongly recommended to use an allow-list approach whenever
possible because such an approach is more robust and simple.
A deny-list will have to be updated whenever a potentially
dangerous system call is added (or a dangerous flag or option if those
are deny-listed), and it is often possible to alter the
representation of a value without altering its meaning, leading to
a deny-list bypass.
See also
Caveats
below.
The
arch
field is not unique for all calling conventions.
The x86-64 ABI and the x32 ABI both use
AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64
as
arch,
and they run on the same processors.
Instead, the mask
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT
is used on the system call number to tell the two ABIs apart.
This means that a policy must either deny all syscalls with
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT
or it must recognize syscalls with and without
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT
set.
A list of system calls to be denied based on
nr
that does not also contain
nr
values with
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT
set can be bypassed by a malicious program that sets
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT.
Additionally, kernels prior to Linux 5.4 incorrectly permitted
nr
in the ranges 512-547 as well as the corresponding non-x32 syscalls ORed
with
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT.
For example,
nr
== 521 and
nr
== (101 |
__X32_SYSCALL_BIT)
would result in invocations of
ptrace(2)
with potentially confused x32-vs-x86_64 semantics in the kernel.
Policies intended to work on kernels before Linux 5.4 must ensure that they
deny or otherwise correctly handle these system calls.
On Linux 5.4 and newer,
such system calls will fail with the error
ENOSYS,
without doing anything.
The
instruction_pointer
field provides the address of the machine-language instruction that
performed the system call.
This might be useful in conjunction with the use of
/proc/[pid]/maps
to perform checks based on which region (mapping) of the program
made the system call.
(Probably, it is wise to lock down the
mmap(2)
and
mprotect(2)
system calls to prevent the program from subverting such checks.)
When checking values from
args,
keep in mind that arguments are often
silently truncated before being processed, but after the seccomp check.
For example, this happens if the i386 ABI is used on an
x86-64 kernel: although the kernel will normally not look beyond
the 32 lowest bits of the arguments, the values of the full
64-bit registers will be present in the seccomp data.
A less surprising example is that if the x86-64 ABI is used to perform
a system call that takes an argument of type
int,
the more-significant half of the argument register is ignored by
the system call, but visible in the seccomp data.
A seccomp filter returns a 32-bit value consisting of two parts:
the most significant 16 bits
(corresponding to the mask defined by the constant
SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)
contain one of the "action" values listed below;
the least significant 16-bits (defined by the constant
SECCOMP_RET_DATA)
are "data" to be associated with this return value.
If multiple filters exist, they are all executed,
in reverse order of their addition to the filter tree---that is,
the most recently installed filter is executed first.
(Note that all filters will be called
even if one of the earlier filters returns
SECCOMP_RET_KILL.
This is done to simplify the kernel code and to provide a
tiny speed-up in the execution of sets of filters by
avoiding a check for this uncommon case.)
The return value for the evaluation of a given system call is the first-seen
action value of highest precedence (along with its accompanying data)
returned by execution of all of the filters.
In decreasing order of precedence,
the action values that may be returned by a seccomp filter are:
- SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS (since Linux 4.14)
-
This value results in immediate termination of the process,
with a core dump.
The system call is not executed.
By contrast with
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD
below, all threads in the thread group are terminated.
(For a discussion of thread groups, see the description of the
CLONE_THREAD
flag in
clone(2).)
-
The process terminates
as though
killed by a
SIGSYS
signal.
Even if a signal handler has been registered for
SIGSYS,
the handler will be ignored in this case and the process always terminates.
To a parent process that is waiting on this process (using
waitpid(2)
or similar), the returned
wstatus
will indicate that its child was terminated as though by a
SIGSYS
signal.
- SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD (or SECCOMP_RET_KILL)
-
This value results in immediate termination of the thread
that made the system call.
The system call is not executed.
Other threads in the same thread group will continue to execute.
-
The thread terminates
as though
killed by a
SIGSYS
signal.
See
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS
above.
-
Before Linux 4.11,
any process terminated in this way would not trigger a coredump
(even though
SIGSYS
is documented in
signal(7)
as having a default action of termination with a core dump).
Since Linux 4.11,
a single-threaded process will dump core if terminated in this way.
-
With the addition of
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS
in Linux 4.14,
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD
was added as a synonym for
SECCOMP_RET_KILL,
in order to more clearly distinguish the two actions.
-
Note:
the use of
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD
to kill a single thread in a multithreaded process is likely to leave the
process in a permanently inconsistent and possibly corrupt state.
- SECCOMP_RET_TRAP
-
This value results in the kernel sending a thread-directed
SIGSYS
signal to the triggering thread.
(The system call is not executed.)
Various fields will be set in the
siginfo_t
structure (see
sigaction(2))
associated with signal:
-
- *
-
si_signo
will contain
SIGSYS.
- *
-
si_call_addr
will show the address of the system call instruction.
- *
-
si_syscall
and
si_arch
will indicate which system call was attempted.
- *
-
si_code
will contain
SYS_SECCOMP.
- *
-
si_errno
will contain the
SECCOMP_RET_DATA
portion of the filter return value.
-
The program counter will be as though the system call happened
(i.e., the program counter will not point to the system call instruction).
The return value register will contain an architecture-dependent value;
if resuming execution, set it to something appropriate for the system call.
(The architecture dependency is because replacing it with
ENOSYS
could overwrite some useful information.)
- SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO
-
This value results in the
SECCOMP_RET_DATA
portion of the filter's return value being passed to user space as the
errno
value without executing the system call.
- SECCOMP_RET_TRACE
-
When returned, this value will cause the kernel to attempt to notify a
ptrace(2)-based
tracer prior to executing the system call.
If there is no tracer present,
the system call is not executed and returns a failure status with
errno
set to
ENOSYS.
-
A tracer will be notified if it requests
PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP
using
ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS).
The tracer will be notified of a
PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP
and the
SECCOMP_RET_DATA
portion of the filter's return value will be available to the tracer via
PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG.
-
The tracer can skip the system call by changing the system call number
to -1.
Alternatively, the tracer can change the system call
requested by changing the system call to a valid system call number.
If the tracer asks to skip the system call, then the system call will
appear to return the value that the tracer puts in the return value register.
-
Before kernel 4.8, the seccomp check will not be run again after the tracer is
notified.
(This means that, on older kernels, seccomp-based sandboxes
must not
allow use of
ptrace(2)---even
of other
sandboxed processes---without extreme care;
ptracers can use this mechanism to escape from the seccomp sandbox.)
-
Note that a tracer process will not be notified
if another filter returns an action value with a precedence greater than
SECCOMP_RET_TRACE.
- SECCOMP_RET_LOG (since Linux 4.14)
-
This value results in the system call being executed after
the filter return action is logged.
An administrator may override the logging of this action via
the
/proc/sys/kernel/seccomp/actions_logged
file.
- SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW
-
This value results in the system call being executed.
If an action value other than one of the above is specified,
then the filter action is treated as either
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS
(since Linux 4.14)
or
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD
(in Linux 4.13 and earlier).
/proc interfaces
The files in the directory
/proc/sys/kernel/seccomp
provide additional seccomp information and configuration:
- actions_avail (since Linux 4.14)
-
A read-only ordered list of seccomp filter return actions in string form.
The ordering, from left-to-right, is in decreasing order of precedence.
The list represents the set of seccomp filter return actions
supported by the kernel.
- actions_logged (since Linux 4.14)
-
A read-write ordered list of seccomp filter return actions that
are allowed to be logged.
Writes to the file do not need to be in ordered form but reads from
the file will be ordered in the same way as the
actions_avail
file.
-
It is important to note that the value of
actions_logged
does not prevent certain filter return actions from being logged when
the audit subsystem is configured to audit a task.
If the action is not found in the
actions_logged
file, the final decision on whether to audit the action for that task is
ultimately left up to the audit subsystem to decide for all filter return
actions other than
SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW.
-
The "allow" string is not accepted in the
actions_logged
file as it is not possible to log
SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW
actions.
Attempting to write "allow" to the file will fail with the error
EINVAL.
Audit logging of seccomp actions
Since Linux 4.14, the kernel provides the facility to log the
actions returned by seccomp filters in the audit log.
The kernel makes the decision to log an action based on
the action type, whether or not the action is present in the
actions_logged
file, and whether kernel auditing is enabled
(e.g., via the kernel boot option
audit=1).
The rules are as follows:
- *
-
If the action is
SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW,
the action is not logged.
- *
-
Otherwise, if the action is either
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS
or
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD,
and that action appears in the
actions_logged
file, the action is logged.
- *
-
Otherwise, if the filter has requested logging (the
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG
flag)
and the action appears in the
actions_logged
file, the action is logged.
- *
-
Otherwise, if kernel auditing is enabled and the process is being audited
(autrace(8)),
the action is logged.
- *
-
Otherwise, the action is not logged.
RETURN VALUE
On success,
seccomp()
returns 0.
On error, if
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC
was used,
the return value is the ID of the thread
that caused the synchronization failure.
(This ID is a kernel thread ID of the type returned by
clone(2)
and
gettid(2).)
On other errors, -1 is returned, and
errno
is set to indicate the error.
ERRORS
seccomp()
can fail for the following reasons:
- EACCES
-
The caller did not have the
CAP_SYS_ADMIN
capability in its user namespace, or had not set
no_new_privs
before using
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER.
- EFAULT
-
args
was not a valid address.
- EINVAL
-
operation
is unknown or is not supported by this kernel version or configuration.
- EINVAL
-
The specified
flags
are invalid for the given
operation.
- EINVAL
-
operation
included
BPF_ABS,
but the specified offset was not aligned to a 32-bit boundary or exceeded
sizeof(struct seccomp_data).
- EINVAL
-
A secure computing mode has already been set, and
operation
differs from the existing setting.
- EINVAL
-
operation
specified
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER,
but the filter program pointed to by
args
was not valid or the length of the filter program was zero or exceeded
BPF_MAXINSNS
(4096) instructions.
- ENOMEM
-
Out of memory.
- ENOMEM
-
The total length of all filter programs attached
to the calling thread would exceed
MAX_INSNS_PER_PATH
(32768) instructions.
Note that for the purposes of calculating this limit,
each already existing filter program incurs an
overhead penalty of 4 instructions.
- EOPNOTSUPP
-
operation
specified
SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL,
but the kernel does not support the filter return action specified by
args.
- ESRCH
-
Another thread caused a failure during thread sync, but its ID could not
be determined.
VERSIONS
The
seccomp()
system call first appeared in Linux 3.17.
CONFORMING TO
The
seccomp()
system call is a nonstandard Linux extension.
NOTES
Rather than hand-coding seccomp filters as shown in the example below,
you may prefer to employ the
libseccomp
library, which provides a front-end for generating seccomp filters.
The
Seccomp
field of the
/proc/[pid]/status
file provides a method of viewing the seccomp mode of a process; see
proc(5).
seccomp()
provides a superset of the functionality provided by the
prctl(2)
PR_SET_SECCOMP
operation (which does not support
flags).
Since Linux 4.4, the
ptrace(2)
PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER
operation can be used to dump a process's seccomp filters.
Architecture support for seccomp BPF
Architecture support for seccomp BPF filtering
is available on the following architectures:
- *
-
x86-64, i386, x32 (since Linux 3.5)
- *
-
ARM (since Linux 3.8)
- *
-
s390 (since Linux 3.8)
- *
-
MIPS (since Linux 3.16)
- *
-
ARM-64 (since Linux 3.19)
- *
-
PowerPC (since Linux 4.3)
- *
-
Tile (since Linux 4.3)
- *
-
PA-RISC (since Linux 4.6)
Glibc does not provide a wrapper for this system call; call it using
syscall(2).
Caveats
There are various subtleties to consider when applying seccomp filters
to a program, including the following:
- *
-
Some traditional system calls have user-space implementations in the
vdso(7)
on many architectures.
Notable examples include
clock_gettime(2),
gettimeofday(2),
and
time(2).
On such architectures,
seccomp filtering for these system calls will have no effect.
(However, there are cases where the
vdso(7)
implementations may fall back to invoking the true system call,
in which case seccomp filters would see the system call.)
- *
-
Seccomp filtering is based on system call numbers.
However, applications typically do not directly invoke system calls,
but instead call wrapper functions in the C library which
in turn invoke the system calls.
Consequently, one must be aware of the following:
-
- •
-
The glibc wrappers for some traditional system calls may actually
employ system calls with different names in the kernel.
For example, the
exit(2)
wrapper function actually employs the
exit_group(2)
system call, and the
fork(2)
wrapper function actually calls
clone(2).
- •
-
The behavior of wrapper functions may vary across architectures,
according to the range of system calls provided on those architectures.
In other words, the same wrapper function may invoke
different system calls on different architectures.
- •
-
Finally, the behavior of wrapper functions can change across glibc versions.
For example, in older versions, the glibc wrapper function for
open(2)
invoked the system call of the same name,
but starting in glibc 2.26, the implementation switched to calling
openat(2)
on all architectures.
The consequence of the above points is that it may be necessary
to filter for a system call other than might be expected.
Various manual pages in Section 2 provide helpful details
about the differences between wrapper functions and
the underlying system calls in subsections entitled
C library/kernel differences.
Furthermore, note that the application of seccomp filters
even risks causing bugs in an application,
when the filters cause unexpected failures for legitimate operations
that the application might need to perform.
Such bugs may not easily be discovered when testing the seccomp
filters if the bugs occur in rarely used application code paths.
Seccomp-specific BPF details
Note the following BPF details specific to seccomp filters:
- *
-
The
BPF_H
and
BPF_B
size modifiers are not supported: all operations must load and store
(4-byte) words
(BPF_W).
- *
-
To access the contents of the
seccomp_data
buffer, use the
BPF_ABS
addressing mode modifier.
- *
-
The
BPF_LEN
addressing mode modifier yields an immediate mode operand
whose value is the size of the
seccomp_data
buffer.
EXAMPLES
The program below accepts four or more arguments.
The first three arguments are a system call number,
a numeric architecture identifier, and an error number.
The program uses these values to construct a BPF filter
that is used at run time to perform the following checks:
- [1]
-
If the program is not running on the specified architecture,
the BPF filter causes system calls to fail with the error
ENOSYS.
- [2]
-
If the program attempts to execute the system call with the specified number,
the BPF filter causes the system call to fail, with
errno
being set to the specified error number.
The remaining command-line arguments specify
the pathname and additional arguments of a program
that the example program should attempt to execute using
execv(3)
(a library function that employs the
execve(2)
system call).
Some example runs of the program are shown below.
First, we display the architecture that we are running on (x86-64)
and then construct a shell function that looks up system call
numbers on this architecture:
$ uname -m
x86_64
$ syscall_nr() {
cat /usr/src/linux/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | \
awk '$2 != "x32" && $3 == "'$1'" { print $1 }'
}
When the BPF filter rejects a system call (case [2] above),
it causes the system call to fail with the error number
specified on the command line.
In the experiments shown here, we'll use error number 99:
$ errno 99
EADDRNOTAVAIL 99 Cannot assign requested address
In the following example, we attempt to run the command
whoami(1),
but the BPF filter rejects the
execve(2)
system call, so that the command is not even executed:
$ syscall_nr execve
59
$ ./a.out
Usage: ./a.out <syscall_nr> <arch> <errno> <prog> [<args>]
Hint for <arch>: AUDIT_ARCH_I386: 0x40000003
AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64: 0xC000003E
$ ./a.out 59 0xC000003E 99 /bin/whoami
execv: Cannot assign requested address
In the next example, the BPF filter rejects the
write(2)
system call, so that, although it is successfully started, the
whoami(1)
command is not able to write output:
$ syscall_nr write
1
$ ./a.out 1 0xC000003E 99 /bin/whoami
In the final example,
the BPF filter rejects a system call that is not used by the
whoami(1)
command, so it is able to successfully execute and produce output:
$ syscall_nr preadv
295
$ ./a.out 295 0xC000003E 99 /bin/whoami
cecilia
Program source
#include <errno.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#define X32_SYSCALL_BIT 0x40000000
#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
static int
install_filter(int syscall_nr, int t_arch, int f_errno)
{
unsigned int upper_nr_limit = 0xffffffff;
/* Assume that AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64 means the normal x86-64 ABI
(in the x32 ABI, all system calls have bit 30 set in the
'nr' field, meaning the numbers are >= X32_SYSCALL_BIT). */
if (t_arch == AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64)
upper_nr_limit = X32_SYSCALL_BIT - 1;
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
/* [0] Load architecture from 'seccomp_data' buffer into
accumulator. */
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS,
(offsetof(struct seccomp_data, arch))),
/* [1] Jump forward 5 instructions if architecture does not
match 't_arch'. */
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, t_arch, 0, 5),
/* [2] Load system call number from 'seccomp_data' buffer into
accumulator. */
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS,
(offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr))),
/* [3] Check ABI - only needed for x86-64 in deny-list use
cases. Use BPF_JGT instead of checking against the bit
mask to avoid having to reload the syscall number. */
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K, upper_nr_limit, 3, 0),
/* [4] Jump forward 1 instruction if system call number
does not match 'syscall_nr'. */
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, syscall_nr, 0, 1),
/* [5] Matching architecture and system call: don't execute
the system call, and return 'f_errno' in 'errno'. */
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K,
SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO | (f_errno & SECCOMP_RET_DATA)),
/* [6] Destination of system call number mismatch: allow other
system calls. */
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
/* [7] Destination of architecture mismatch: kill process. */
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS),
};
struct sock_fprog prog = {
.len = ARRAY_SIZE(filter),
.filter = filter,
};
if (seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog)) {
perror("seccomp");
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (argc < 5) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: "
"%s <syscall_nr> <arch> <errno> <prog> [<args>]\n"
"Hint for <arch>: AUDIT_ARCH_I386: 0x%X\n"
" AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64: 0x%X\n"
"\n", argv[0], AUDIT_ARCH_I386, AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) {
perror("prctl");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (install_filter(strtol(argv[1], NULL, 0),
strtol(argv[2], NULL, 0),
strtol(argv[3], NULL, 0)))
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
execv(argv[4], &argv[4]);
perror("execv");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
SEE ALSO
bpfc(1),
strace(1),
bpf(2),
prctl(2),
ptrace(2),
sigaction(2),
proc(5),
signal(7),
socket(7)
Various pages from the
libseccomp
library, including:
scmp_sys_resolver(1),
seccomp_export_bpf(3),
seccomp_init(3),
seccomp_load(3),
and
seccomp_rule_add(3).
The kernel source files
Documentation/networking/filter.txt
and
Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
(or
Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt
before Linux 4.13).
McCanne, S. and Jacobson, V. (1992)
The BSD Packet Filter: A New Architecture for User-level Packet Capture,
Proceedings of the USENIX Winter 1993 Conference
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 5.11 of the Linux
man-pages
project.
A description of the project,
information about reporting bugs,
and the latest version of this page,
can be found at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
Index
- NAME
-
- SYNOPSIS
-
- DESCRIPTION
-
- Filters
-
- /proc interfaces
-
- Audit logging of seccomp actions
-
- RETURN VALUE
-
- ERRORS
-
- VERSIONS
-
- CONFORMING TO
-
- NOTES
-
- Architecture support for seccomp BPF
-
- Caveats
-
- Seccomp-specific BPF details
-
- EXAMPLES
-
- Program source
-
- SEE ALSO
-
- COLOPHON
-
This document was created by
man2html,
using the manual pages.
Time: 06:22:44 GMT, May 09, 2021