One good way to develop in
PL/pgSQL is to use the text editor of your
choice to create your functions, and in another window, use
psql to load and test those functions.
If you are doing it this way, it
is a good idea to write the function using CREATE OR
REPLACE FUNCTION. That way you can just reload the file to update
the function definition. For example:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testfunc(integer) RETURNS integer AS $$
....
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
While running psql, you can load or reload such a function definition file with:
\i filename.sql
and then immediately issue SQL commands to test the function.
Another good way to develop in PL/pgSQL is with a GUI database access tool that facilitates development in a procedural language. One example of such a tool is pgAdmin, although others exist. These tools often provide convenient features such as escaping single quotes and making it easier to recreate and debug functions.
The code of a PL/pgSQL function is specified in
CREATE FUNCTION as a string literal. If you
write the string literal in the ordinary way with surrounding
single quotes, then any single quotes inside the function body
must be doubled; likewise any backslashes must be doubled (assuming
escape string syntax is used).
Doubling quotes is at best tedious, and in more complicated cases
the code can become downright incomprehensible, because you can
easily find yourself needing half a dozen or more adjacent quote marks.
It's recommended that you instead write the function body as a
“dollar-quoted” string literal (see Section 4.1.2.4). In the dollar-quoting
approach, you never double any quote marks, but instead take care to
choose a different dollar-quoting delimiter for each level of
nesting you need. For example, you might write the CREATE
FUNCTION command as:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testfunc(integer) RETURNS integer AS $PROC$
....
$PROC$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Within this, you might use quote marks for simple literal strings in
SQL commands and $$ to delimit fragments of SQL commands
that you are assembling as strings. If you need to quote text that
includes $$, you could use $Q$, and so on.
The following chart shows what you have to do when writing quote marks without dollar quoting. It might be useful when translating pre-dollar quoting code into something more comprehensible.
To begin and end the function body, for example:
CREATE FUNCTION foo() RETURNS integer AS '
....
' LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Anywhere within a single-quoted function body, quote marks must appear in pairs.
For string literals inside the function body, for example:
a_output := ''Blah''; SELECT * FROM users WHERE f_name=''foobar'';
In the dollar-quoting approach, you'd just write:
a_output := 'Blah'; SELECT * FROM users WHERE f_name='foobar';
which is exactly what the PL/pgSQL parser would see in either case.
When you need a single quotation mark in a string constant inside the function body, for example:
a_output := a_output || '' AND name LIKE ''''foobar'''' AND xyz''
The value actually appended to a_output would be:
AND name LIKE 'foobar' AND xyz.
In the dollar-quoting approach, you'd write:
a_output := a_output || $$ AND name LIKE 'foobar' AND xyz$$
being careful that any dollar-quote delimiters around this are not
just $$.
When a single quotation mark in a string inside the function body is adjacent to the end of that string constant, for example:
a_output := a_output || '' AND name LIKE ''''foobar''''''
The value appended to a_output would then be:
AND name LIKE 'foobar'.
In the dollar-quoting approach, this becomes:
a_output := a_output || $$ AND name LIKE 'foobar'$$
When you want two single quotation marks in a string constant (which accounts for 8 quotation marks) and this is adjacent to the end of that string constant (2 more). You will probably only need that if you are writing a function that generates other functions, as in Example 42.10. For example:
a_output := a_output || '' if v_'' ||
referrer_keys.kind || '' like ''''''''''
|| referrer_keys.key_string || ''''''''''
then return '''''' || referrer_keys.referrer_type
|| ''''''; end if;'';
The value of a_output would then be:
if v_... like ''...'' then return ''...''; end if;
In the dollar-quoting approach, this becomes:
a_output := a_output || $$ if v_$$ || referrer_keys.kind || $$ like '$$
|| referrer_keys.key_string || $$'
then return '$$ || referrer_keys.referrer_type
|| $$'; end if;$$;
where we assume we only need to put single quote marks into
a_output, because it will be re-quoted before use.
To aid the user in finding instances of simple but common problems before
they cause harm, PL/pgSQL provides additional
checks. When enabled, depending on the configuration, they
can be used to emit either a WARNING or an ERROR
during the compilation of a function. A function which has received
a WARNING can be executed without producing further messages,
so you are advised to test in a separate development environment.
Setting plpgsql.extra_warnings, or
plpgsql.extra_errors, as appropriate, to "all"
is encouraged in development and/or testing environments.
These additional checks are enabled through the configuration variables
plpgsql.extra_warnings for warnings and
plpgsql.extra_errors for errors. Both can be set either to
a comma-separated list of checks, "none" or
"all". The default is "none". Currently
the list of available checks includes:
shadowed_variablesChecks if a declaration shadows a previously defined variable.
strict_multi_assignment
Some PL/PgSQL commands allow assigning
values to more than one variable at a time, such as
SELECT INTO. Typically, the number of target
variables and the number of source variables should match, though
PL/PgSQL will use NULL
for missing values and extra variables are ignored. Enabling this
check will cause PL/PgSQL to throw a
WARNING or ERROR whenever the
number of target variables and the number of source variables are
different.
too_many_rows
Enabling this check will cause PL/PgSQL to
check if a given query returns more than one row when an
INTO clause is used. As an INTO
statement will only ever use one row, having a query return multiple
rows is generally either inefficient and/or nondeterministic and
therefore is likely an error.
The following example shows the effect of plpgsql.extra_warnings
set to shadowed_variables:
SET plpgsql.extra_warnings TO 'shadowed_variables';
CREATE FUNCTION foo(f1 int) RETURNS int AS $$
DECLARE
f1 int;
BEGIN
RETURN f1;
END
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
WARNING: variable "f1" shadows a previously defined variable
LINE 3: f1 int;
^
CREATE FUNCTION
The below example shows the effects of setting
plpgsql.extra_warnings to
strict_multi_assignment:
SET plpgsql.extra_warnings TO 'strict_multi_assignment'; CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.foo() RETURNS void LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ DECLARE x int; y int; BEGIN SELECT 1 INTO x, y; SELECT 1, 2 INTO x, y; SELECT 1, 2, 3 INTO x, y; END; $$; SELECT foo(); WARNING: number of source and target fields in assignment does not match DETAIL: strict_multi_assignment check of extra_warnings is active. HINT: Make sure the query returns the exact list of columns. WARNING: number of source and target fields in assignment does not match DETAIL: strict_multi_assignment check of extra_warnings is active. HINT: Make sure the query returns the exact list of columns. foo ----- (1 row)